In this section we are attempting to infer how writers might feel when browsing for literary agents. We were interested in the tone of the submissions process as well as what guidance is and is not provided.
One part of the guidance that we found especially interesting is around the approach to rejections; whether agents commit to respond no matter the outcome, or whether writers must simply assume rejection after a certain period of time.
How might an agency websites make new writers feel? We assessed the 'tone' of agents' submissions instructions.
This encouraging, a reasonably large minority of sites adopt a supportive or warm tone (29%), and the large majority (66%) adopt a neutral tone.
This is a common bugbear with new writers; simply not getting a response to a submission. We picked through the guidelines to look for agents that either stated that no response indicates a rejection, or that they will respond irrespective of the outcome.
A little under half of agents (48%) provide no information on the rejection process (i.e. whether they will respond or how long to wait before assuming rejection). 8% of agents explicitly state that they will respond no matter the outcome. The remaining 44% state that they will only respond if they are interested in the submission, else they provide a timeframe after which rejection can be assumed.
Of the 44% of agents that state that once a time period has elapsed, writers can assume rejection, we recorded each timeframe. When a time range was provided (e.g: 8 to 10 weeks), we used the upper bound.
It is not uncommon to have to wait for an uncomfortable 3 months before assuming rejection, though 2 months is the most common timeframe. Does this seem reasonable? It is certainly rare to expect a response within a month.
Note that in compiling this information we only analysed the text from the submissions instructions. It is possible that some agencies will promote and encourage submissions from under-represented groups on other parts of their websites.